Published 16 April 2019
Costs — notice of claim — Calderbank proposal — Property (Relationships) Act 1976. In October the Judge had made an order in respect of the applicant's application to sustain notices of claim against two properties owned by the interested party. The application to sustain the notice of claim was successful for one property and unsuccessful for the other, although if that property was sold the interested party must retain 50% of the proceeds in their solicitor's trust account. This outcome mirrored an offer that had been made by the applicant six weeks prior to the hearing. The respondents claimed they had offered a better deal to the applicant and therefore should be entitled costs. The Judge rejected this, as the offer they had made regarded a third unrelated property and would not protect the applicant's claim and interest as well as the order from the hearing. The respondents' offer was also only made some 24 hours prior to the hearing. It was decided the applicant was entitled to costs to the amount of $4,539. Judgment Date: 24 December 2018.
This website explains many of the things you might want to know if you are coming to the Youth Court, or just wondering how the Youth Court works.
Visit website›Ministry of Justice website with information on family issues including about going to court, forms and other times when you may need help.
Visit website›For information about courts and tribunals, including going to court, finding a court & collection of fines and reparation.
Visit website›On this site you will find information about our Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and High Court including recent decisions, daily lists and news.
Visit website›