Published 02 March 2017
Estoppel — damages — Plumbers, Gasfitters, and Drainlayers Act 2006, ss 90, 91, 92 and 162 — Christou v Haringey London Borough Council [2014] QB 131. The plaintiff sought damages against the defendants following the flooding of a property. Under ss 90–92 complaints had been made and investigations concluded under the PGD Act, which found no fault with the defendant's work. The plaintiff failed to appeal under the Act within time (s 162), but begun proceedings in the Disputes Tribunal which were transferred to the District Court. On analysis of case law including "Christou", it was determined that the inspector fulfilled the definition of a "judicial tribunal", and therefore the doctrine of res judicata could apply. As a result, the defendants were able to rely on an estoppel to the claims brought. Judgment Date: 4 October 2016.
This website explains many of the things you might want to know if you are coming to the Youth Court, or just wondering how the Youth Court works.
Visit website›Ministry of Justice website with information on family issues including about going to court, forms and other times when you may need help.
Visit website›For information about courts and tribunals, including going to court, finding a court & collection of fines and reparation.
Visit website›On this site you will find information about our Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and High Court including recent decisions, daily lists and news.
Visit website›