Published 08 November 2016
Application for recount — whether reasonable grounds to believe that the declaration is incorrect exists — whether on a recount the candidate might be elected — Local Electoral Act 2001, s 90. An application for recount of the votes in the Dunstan Constituency for the Otago Regional Council was declined. The applicant was the fourth highest polling candidate in the election for one of three seats in the Dunstan Constituency for the Otago Regional Council. With a margin of five votes, the application was made on the basis that there was "an extremely close result". Noting that closeness of a result on its own is not sufficient evidence amounting to reasonable grounds for a belief that the declaration is incorrect, the Judge considered the process by which the votes were counted. It was found that the process is robust, provides sufficient checks and balances and that there were no reasonable grounds to believe that the declaration was incorrect and the applicant might be elected on a recount. Judgment Date: 21 October 2016.
This website explains many of the things you might want to know if you are coming to the Youth Court, or just wondering how the Youth Court works.
Visit website›Ministry of Justice website with information on family issues including about going to court, forms and other times when you may need help.
Visit website›For information about courts and tribunals, including going to court, finding a court & collection of fines and reparation.
Visit website›On this site you will find information about our Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and High Court including recent decisions, daily lists and news.
Visit website›