Published 03 March 2017
Alleged breach of contract — counterclaim — causal connection to loss — March v E & M H Stramare Pty Limited [1991] 171 CLR 506 — Stapely v Gypsum Mines Limited [1953] AC 663. Applying a common sense approach to the facts of the case ("March"), the plaintiff was unable to demonstrate a nexus between the alleged breach of contract by the defendant and loss suffered ("Stapely"). Neither could the plaintiff claim loss of rent or penalty rates under the contract due to the ownership of the property and terms of the contract. The defendant's counterclaim was unsuccessful because of failure to clarify to the Court the costs outstanding for work done. As neither party had been successful, costs would lie where they fell. Judgment Date: 4 November 2016.
This website explains many of the things you might want to know if you are coming to the Youth Court, or just wondering how the Youth Court works.
Visit website›Ministry of Justice website with information on family issues including about going to court, forms and other times when you may need help.
Visit website›For information about courts and tribunals, including going to court, finding a court & collection of fines and reparation.
Visit website›On this site you will find information about our Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and High Court including recent decisions, daily lists and news.
Visit website›