Published 24 January 2017
Leave to vary parenting order within two year period — Care of Children Act 2004, ss 7A and 139A — Family Courts Rules 2002, r 416ZF. Parties sought to vary a parenting order under the Care of Children Act whilst a statutory ban of two years was in place. The Judge took issue with the fact that parties attempted to file a consent memorandum that requested leave in advance under s 139A. It was noted that s 139A clearly "provides a statutory framework of analysis that must be undertaken at the time of application based on the evidence filed prior to a judicial determination being made to decline or grant such leave". The Court held that it is not open for any Judge to provide leave in anticipation to s 139A ahead of any evidence being filed. Nor was it open for a Judge to determine in advance how an application was to be filed or on what track. Given that the Judge was unable to hear the matter as a s 139A hearing it was instead treated as a r 416ZF directions conference. A time for a limited hearing regarding whether the children could have contact with their mother was allocated. Judgment Date: 13 September 2016. * * * Note: Names have been changed to comply with legal requirements * * *
This website explains many of the things you might want to know if you are coming to the Youth Court, or just wondering how the Youth Court works.
Visit website›Ministry of Justice website with information on family issues including about going to court, forms and other times when you may need help.
Visit website›For information about courts and tribunals, including going to court, finding a court & collection of fines and reparation.
Visit website›On this site you will find information about our Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and High Court including recent decisions, daily lists and news.
Visit website›