Published 24 April 2017
Fitness to stand trial — whether psychologist assessment can have any effect on the decision which has already been made — Police v N J [Born in June 1994] — Intellectual Disabilities (Compulsory Care and Rehabilitation) Act 2003, Part 3. The question arose as to whether the Judge should reconsider his finding that the young person was not fit to stand trial in light of a psychologist's assessment made at the Part 3 assessment stage under the ID (CCR) Act. The Judge found that it would not be appropriate for his finding be subject to further opinion after the decision had been made ("Police v N J"). As in "N J", it was not practical to allow a diagnosis to be contradicted by a specialist at the Part 3 stage. The decision would proceed to disposition. Judgment Date: 4 April 2016. * * * Note: Names have been changed to comply with legal requirements * * *
This website explains many of the things you might want to know if you are coming to the Youth Court, or just wondering how the Youth Court works.
Visit website›Ministry of Justice website with information on family issues including about going to court, forms and other times when you may need help.
Visit website›For information about courts and tribunals, including going to court, finding a court & collection of fines and reparation.
Visit website›On this site you will find information about our Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and High Court including recent decisions, daily lists and news.
Visit website›