Published 30 August 2019
WorkSafe — discharge without conviction — Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 s 45 — Sentencing Act 2002 ss 9, 106 &107 — Criminal Procedure Act 2011 — Z (CA447/12) v R [2012] NZCA 599 — Delaney v Police HC Wellington CRI-2005-485-22, 22 April 2005. The defendant was charged under s 45 of the Health and Safety at Work Act after unloading a digger by crane which had its cables snap, causing it to fall close to other workers. The defendant sought a discharge without conviction as it was his first conviction, it would affect his employment prospects, and he had suffered significant financial and personal penalty from the incident. The Judge considered the three steps in determining a s 106 application, namely: the gravity of the offence; the direct and indirect consequences of conviction; and the question of whether or not the consequences are out of all proportion to the gravity of the offence. The Judge held that the balancing exercise firmly favoured conviction, but while the charge warranted a starting point of $8000 in fines (after discounts an approximate end fine of $800), the Judge considered there was no need for further deterrence or penalty. The defendant was convicted and discharged. Judgment Date: 1 February 2019.
This website explains many of the things you might want to know if you are coming to the Youth Court, or just wondering how the Youth Court works.
Visit website›Ministry of Justice website with information on family issues including about going to court, forms and other times when you may need help.
Visit website›For information about courts and tribunals, including going to court, finding a court & collection of fines and reparation.
Visit website›On this site you will find information about our Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and High Court including recent decisions, daily lists and news.
Visit website›