Published 09 May 2022
Guardianship — parenting order — relocation — Care of Children Act 2004 — Oranga Tamariki Act 1989, ss 78 & 101. The applicant father wanted his son (the child) to live with him in Australia. Therefore the applicant applied for a parenting order over the child, and to have Oranga Tamariki's interim custody order over the child discharged. There were long-standing concerns over the ability of the child's mother to take proper care of him, and for most of his life he had been in the care of his maternal grandmother, with Oranga Tamariki having previously intervened to ensure that he remained in his grandmother's care. The Court observed that the child needed certainty and finality in terms of his care arrangements, and the child himself had expressed a wish to go into the applicant's care as soon as possible. The Court found that the orders sought were consistent with the welfare and best interests of the child. There were no safety concerns surrounding the applicant, and the child would be able to maintain contact with his mother's family. The Court made a final parenting order in favour of the applicant. Judgment Date: 29 November 2021 * * * Note: names have been changed to comply with legal requirements. * * *
This website explains many of the things you might want to know if you are coming to the Youth Court, or just wondering how the Youth Court works.
Visit website›Ministry of Justice website with information on family issues including about going to court, forms and other times when you may need help.
Visit website›For information about courts and tribunals, including going to court, finding a court & collection of fines and reparation.
Visit website›On this site you will find information about our Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and High Court including recent decisions, daily lists and news.
Visit website›