Published 10 September 2020
Failing to comply with food plan — risk to lives and health of public — pest infestation — cockroach infestation — rotten food — R v Taueki [2005] 3 NZLR 372 — Auckland Council v Po Yuan Meadowlands Ltd [2018] NZDC 15961 — Auckland Council v Cook Brothers Bar Auckland Ltd [2019] NZDC 14158 — Auckland Council v Dieb & Dieb Mao Ltd [2019] 13456 — Food Act 2014, ss 50, 59, 224, 245, 268-273, 274 & 275. The defendant appeared for sentencing on a charge of failing to comply with a food plan and therefore posing a danger to public health and safety. The defendant business sold prepared and manufactured food directly to consumers. An inspection by food safety officers had found the defendant's premises unclean, with pest infestations and decaying food products on the premises, and had ordered the business to close. Two subsequent inspections had found food products with pest infestations. With reference to the likelihood, extent, and seriousness of the harm posed by the offending, as well as the number of breaches of the food plan, the Court found that the offending fell into the medium band of culpability established by the Court in the Cook Brothers decision. The start point for fine was $60,000, which was reduced to $45,000 because of the defendant's guilty plea. The Court also ordered costs of $130. Judgment Date: 20 December 2019.
This website explains many of the things you might want to know if you are coming to the Youth Court, or just wondering how the Youth Court works.
Visit website›Ministry of Justice website with information on family issues including about going to court, forms and other times when you may need help.
Visit website›For information about courts and tribunals, including going to court, finding a court & collection of fines and reparation.
Visit website›On this site you will find information about our Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and High Court including recent decisions, daily lists and news.
Visit website›