Published 08 June 2022
Sentencing — failing to ensure dog received necessary treatment to alleviate pain and suffering — failing to ensure dog had its health, physical and behavioural needs met — name suppression. The defendant appeared for sentence on charges of failing to ensure that her dog received necessary treatment to alleviate pain and suffering, and failing to ensure the dog had its health, physical and behavioural needs met. SPCA inspectors had observed that the defendant's dog was in poor condition, and a subsequent vet report established that the dog had been suffering for a considerable time. The defendant said that she knew that the dog was old but did not realise that it was suffering. Given that the defendant suffered anxiety and depression and was vulnerable, the Court ordered that her name and the name of the dog be suppressed. In spite of the duration of the offending, the defendant was of previous good character and had pleaded guilty early. The Court convicted and discharged the defendant on all charges, but ordered that she pay reparations of $83.10 and costs of $200. The defendant was also disqualified from owning a companion pet for five years. Judgment Date: 2 June 2020. * * * Note: names have been changed to comply with legal requirements. * * *
This website explains many of the things you might want to know if you are coming to the Youth Court, or just wondering how the Youth Court works.
Ministry of Justice website with information on family issues including about going to court, forms and other times when you may need help.
For information about courts and tribunals, including going to court, finding a court & collection of fines and reparation.
On this site you will find information about our Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and High Court including recent decisions, daily lists and news.