Published 06 May 2019
Application to make prosecution adduce defendant's police interview — indecent assault — Criminal Procedure Act 2011, s 113 — Evidence Act 2006, s 21 — R v King [2009] NZDC 607 — Rapana v R [2015] NZHC 2286. The defendant sought an order requiring the prosecution to adduce the defendant's police interview as part of the prosecution case, as per s 113(3) of the Criminal Procedure Act. The defendant, a hospital nurse, allegedly twice indecently assaulted a patient who was recovering from a medical procedure. The Judge laid out the law underpinning s 113 and the central issue at hand; whether the defendant, in his police interview, made admissions of fact that were capable of adding some degree of weight to the prosecution case on an issue which is relevant to guilt. Upon reviewing the interview transcript, the Judge found that it was entirely exculpatory and therefore it would not be unfair for the prosecution to not lead evidence of the defendant's statement at his trial. However, the Judge did provide that as a matter of fairness the defendant may refer to a short part of the interview relating to the defendant speaking to his colleagues about the patient, but how far that inquiry would extend would be a matter for the trial Judge. Judgment Date: 16 April 2018.
This website explains many of the things you might want to know if you are coming to the Youth Court, or just wondering how the Youth Court works.
Visit website›Ministry of Justice website with information on family issues including about going to court, forms and other times when you may need help.
Visit website›For information about courts and tribunals, including going to court, finding a court & collection of fines and reparation.
Visit website›On this site you will find information about our Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and High Court including recent decisions, daily lists and news.
Visit website›