Published 25 February 2020
Sentencing — making a false or misleading representation — communication services — customer billing — termination of contract — billing beyond termination — no guiding tariff case — Commerce Commission v L D Nathan [1990] 2 NZLR 160 — Commerce Commission v Spark New Zealand Trading Ltd [2019] NZDC 7801. The defendant appeared for sentencing on 14 charges of making a false or misleading claim. It was a telecommunications company that had inadvertently continued to bill some of its former customers beyond their contract termination periods. The defendant's billing error resulted in it overcharging 29,425 customers to the amount of $285,359.37. Some of the defendant's staff were aware of the billing system shortcomings that gave rise to the offending. The Court observed that the offending involved material departures from the truth and undermined consumers' faith in the market. The defendant's culpability was increased by its knowledge of the shortcomings of its billing system. The Court set a start point for fine of $450,000, and uplifted this by $70,000 for the defendant's previous relevant convictions. With discounts for cooperation with the investigation, attempts to refund the customers and charitable donations, and guilty plea, the final fine was $350,000. Judgment Date: 1 May 2019.
This website explains many of the things you might want to know if you are coming to the Youth Court, or just wondering how the Youth Court works.
Visit website›Ministry of Justice website with information on family issues including about going to court, forms and other times when you may need help.
Visit website›For information about courts and tribunals, including going to court, finding a court & collection of fines and reparation.
Visit website›On this site you will find information about our Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and High Court including recent decisions, daily lists and news.
Visit website›