Published 16 April 2019
Sentencing — Animal Welfare Act 1999 — animal cruelty — come up if called on. The defendant appeared for sentencing on two charges under the Animal Welfare Act 1999 relating to two cattle owned by the defendant. In both instances, the cattle were suffering and the defendant failed to take proper advice given to him. The Judge, with the aid of reports by two experts, acknowledged that the defendant was a lifelong farmer who made a poor decision that caused the two animals to suffer. The suffering was avoidable. Both parties agreed on a similar range of $2500 - $3000 for the starting point of the fine. However, due to the defendant's guilty pleas, good farming record and the cost to the defendant in terms of the steps taken, the Judge determined that the best sentence was one of a 12 month come up if called on. Should the defendant have a clean record for 12 months, the matter would be dropped, but if issues arose the defendant would be re-sentenced. The sentence was to serve as an incentive for adopting best practices in the future. Judgment Date: 17 October 2018.
This website explains many of the things you might want to know if you are coming to the Youth Court, or just wondering how the Youth Court works.
Visit website›Ministry of Justice website with information on family issues including about going to court, forms and other times when you may need help.
Visit website›For information about courts and tribunals, including going to court, finding a court & collection of fines and reparation.
Visit website›On this site you will find information about our Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and High Court including recent decisions, daily lists and news.
Visit website›