Published 13 June 2019
Sentencing — whether to transfer young person to the District Court — Rangatahi Court — Oranga Tamariki Act 1989, ss 4, 5, 208 & 284 — Criminal Procedure (Mentally Impaired Persons) Act 2003. The young person, IX, appeared in the Youth Court after striking his sister on the head with a wooden stake. The Judge had to decide whether to transfer IX to the District Court for sentencing or keep him in the jurisdiction of the Youth Court where he could complete a plan under supervision. The Crown submitted that the lack of support from IX's family and the serious nature of the offending meant he should be transferred to the District Court, as he was at risk of re-offending. In favour of retaining IX in the Youth Court was IX's low IQ, rough upbringing and that he would be more likely to re-offend after facing a lengthy custodial sentence in the District Court. In the end, the Judge decided not to convict and transfer the young person to the District Court. The community would be safer in the long run if IX had the opportunity for rehabilitation. IX's progress was to be monitored by the Rangatahi Court. Judgment Date: 14 September 2017. * * * Note: names have been changed to comply with legal requirements. * * *
This website explains many of the things you might want to know if you are coming to the Youth Court, or just wondering how the Youth Court works.
Visit website›Ministry of Justice website with information on family issues including about going to court, forms and other times when you may need help.
Visit website›For information about courts and tribunals, including going to court, finding a court & collection of fines and reparation.
Visit website›On this site you will find information about our Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and High Court including recent decisions, daily lists and news.
Visit website›