Published 03 March 2017
Entitlement to cancel contract — Contractual Remedies Act 1979, s 7 — Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 — Oxborough v North Harbour Builders Limited [2002] 1 NZLR 145 — Banko de Portugal v Waterlow and Sons Limited [1932] AC 452. The issue was whether the defendant was entitled to cancel a contract with the defendant under s 7(4)(b)(ii) for breach of a term of that contract which substantially increased the burden of the cancelling party. The contract related to construction of a dwelling, and the conduct which induced the cancellation was the quality of the work involved which failed to meet compliance on 11 counts according to a District Council report. The Judge determined that the breach was substantial and due to uncertainty regarding the plaintiff's remedial work cancellation was justified. The plaintiff's claim of betterment following the defendant's remedial actions was dismissed in light of "Banko". An award of $15,000 general damages for distress, inconvenience and financial difficulties was awarded. Judgment Date: 9 November 2016.
This website explains many of the things you might want to know if you are coming to the Youth Court, or just wondering how the Youth Court works.
Visit website›Ministry of Justice website with information on family issues including about going to court, forms and other times when you may need help.
Visit website›For information about courts and tribunals, including going to court, finding a court & collection of fines and reparation.
Visit website›On this site you will find information about our Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and High Court including recent decisions, daily lists and news.
Visit website›