Published 07 August 2018
Use of a document — assault — driving offences — Criminal Procedure (Mentally Impaired Persons) Act 2003, s 9 — Children, Young Persons, and Their Families Act 1989, s 245. Following a s 9 hearing, it was found that the evidence established the young person's involvement in the offending on the balance of probabilities. This is a requirement under the CP(MIP) Act before the Court may make a finding as to whether a defendant is unfit to stand trial. At issue was whether the charge was a nullity and whether the evidence was sufficient to meet the threshold. A jurisdictional matter regarding s 245 was also resolved; the young person had been arrested for aggravated robbery but was charged with use of a document, the Judge noting that on a straight reading of s 245 (1) a young person should be charged with the offence for which they were arrested. With reference to "K v Police" and the factual matrix of this case, it was determined the charge was validly laid because of the linkage between the incident which resulted in arrest and the charge, despite there being no youth justice co-ordinator consulted or family group conference held regarding a use of a document charge. Judgment Date: 30 September 2016. * * * Note: Names have been changed to comply with legal requirements * * *
This website explains many of the things you might want to know if you are coming to the Youth Court, or just wondering how the Youth Court works.
Visit website›Ministry of Justice website with information on family issues including about going to court, forms and other times when you may need help.
Visit website›For information about courts and tribunals, including going to court, finding a court & collection of fines and reparation.
Visit website›On this site you will find information about our Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and High Court including recent decisions, daily lists and news.
Visit website›