Published 10 January 2024
Appeal from Tribunal — Tenancy Tribunal — jurisdiction of Tenancy Tribunal — temporary or transient accommodation — "boarding house" — exemplary damages — Residential Tenancies Act 1986, ss 5(1), 13A, 66B & 66C. The appellant appealed a decision of the Tenancy Tribunal. The respondent had moved to the appellant's camping ground because he needed emergency accommodation. Once he arrived he signed an agreement to abide by the appellant's rules. He was later evicted for breaching the rules. The Tribunal had found that the appellant had provided the respondent with a boarding house tenancy. This meant that the matter therefore fell under the Residential Tenancies Act (the Act), and that the Tribunal had had jurisdiction to hear it. The Tribunal had then ordered the appellant to pay the respondent to pay $850 in exemplary damages. The Court found that the accommodation arrangement did not meet the Act's definition of a boarding house tenancy agreement. The arrangement was emergency accommodation that was funded by WINZ. Therefore the Tribunal had had no jurisdiction to hear the matter. It had also been wrong to order exemplary damages to the respondent. The appellant had genuinely believed that it had not needed to lodge a bond with the Bond Centre, and it had had genuine reasons for evicting the respondent from its premises. The Tribunal's orders were quashed. Judgment Date: 9 November 2021
This website explains many of the things you might want to know if you are coming to the Youth Court, or just wondering how the Youth Court works.
Visit website›Ministry of Justice website with information on family issues including about going to court, forms and other times when you may need help.
Visit website›For information about courts and tribunals, including going to court, finding a court & collection of fines and reparation.
Visit website›On this site you will find information about our Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and High Court including recent decisions, daily lists and news.
Visit website›